News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Announcing TypeScript 2.1 by RyanCavanaugh on Wednesday December 07, 2016 @02:13PM (#13125269)
Where do you perceive the C#-ness of TS coming from? TS and Flow are ~90% identical (most programs accepted by one would be accepted by the other) and TS adds only a few purely optional syntactic features (namespace, enum) that are widely found in other languages.
Re:Announcing TypeScript 2.1 by g00gler on Thursday December 08, 2016 @12:44PM (#13132255)
* Disclaimer: Correct me if I'm wrong, I haven't used flow extensively but I did check the docs.

One big thing is TypeScript classes are entirely different than standard JS classes. I guess you don't have to use them but it adds Abstract classes, interfaces and access control (eg private, protected vars).

Re:Announcing TypeScript 2.1 by gokhan on Wednesday December 07, 2016 @02:43PM (#13125541)
Might be referring to <T> or var smt = new Smt(); or the use of ? etc.
Re:Announcing TypeScript 2.1 by thejameskyle on Wednesday December 07, 2016 @02:53PM (#13125630)
Those all exist in Flow as well.

I assume the original poster is talking about how few types you actually need to write in Flow because of how good the inference is.

Re:Announcing TypeScript 2.1 by boubiyeah on Wednesday December 07, 2016 @05:34PM (#13126900)
Nowadays, typescript inference is not any worse than Flow's though.