Re:Google says it will run entirely on renewable energy in 2017
by magicalist on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @06:53PM
(#13119324)
> Google's datacenter energy consumption, is difficult to guess, if there are 1 million servers, and assuming each server consumes 10KWH per day, then it makes ~3.5 TWH per year
FWIW, the linked article mentions
> The 5.7 terawatt-hours of electricity Google consumed in 2015 “is equal to the output of two 500 megawatt coal plants,” said Jonathan Koomey
though they don't mention the source
Re:Google says it will run entirely on renewable energy in 2017
by kwhitefoot on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @04:46PM
(#13118620)
kWh not kW/h
Then lets do a back of the envelope calculation for energy consumption for Apple's aluminum use.
Very roughly Apple sells ~25 million macs and ~200 million iphones per year. Again lets assume that it needs 2kg of aluminum for macbooks and 100g for phones (not all iphones are aluminum and this might be lower), that makes ~70 thousand metric tonnes of aluminum.
Modern smelters use 13KW/h to produce 1 kilogram of aluminum, but their production involves recycled aluminum (and possibly shavings from milling?) so number should be lower, lets say it is 10KWH per kilo.
This makes 70M*10KWh = 700GW/h year
Google's datacenter energy consumption, is difficult to guess, if there are 1 million servers, and assuming each server consumes 10KWH per day, then it makes ~3.5 TWH per year.
This is apples to oranges of course, aluminum vs server running energy costs, but still kinda implies that Google uses more energy, at least directly.