Ask HN: Do you click "comments" on Hacker News?
Curious to see how some find value in the link at the top that shows most recent comments--"comments" at the top of HN.
Of course, the front page and "new" are handy to discover what is popular and what has recently been submitted; and "threads" is handy to see how some respond to your comments, but what about "comments"?
Since all of the comments are new, it doesn't seem as useful to me as looking at new submitted links. Now if there was a "front page" for trending popular comments (and if I'm missing it, let me know), I could see that having the potential to drawing your eye to a possibly hotly debated topic.
So, do you click it and how do you "use" it?
Help me find the value.
(
16 comments
| 10 points
| on HN
)
http://share.shmichael.com/hn_comment_embed.user.js
It shows a small tab on the right side of the page that expands to display the relevant HN page.
Here's a screenshot of the comment panel, once you open it: http://shmichael.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/hne.png
And for chrome, ported by a friend:
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/hhedbplnihmkekhg...
Also, sometimes I load the "comment" page, and scroll down to the area where the comments are 30-60 minutes old. Generally anything that's gotten voted up at all is pretty interesting, so the insight efficiency ratio is pretty high.
I picked up that second habit from something similar that I think a lot of people do on the "new" page: if a submission is 40 minutes old, giving it it's fourth vote can make a real difference to the arc of the submission, in terms of how much attention it gets.
http://news.ycombinator.com/bestcomments
An extra page with most popular comments wouldn't be as interesting for me, as a comment without context (the link) is rather worthless. And if i first read the article i might be interested in all sorts of comments. Quite often, only because a comment has many points, it doesn't mean it's the most interesting.
You can count a "no" for me too.
The comment is in black, with the title in grey, so the first thing that sticks out is the content of the comment. You're automatically jumping into the conversation mid-stream without knowing what it's all about.
You have to concentrate to go to the title first, then the comment.
Also, you end up with the same articles again and again, but contextually broken up. It might be nice to have the page show just the unique entries, and then the most recent comments on that entry which would have made it into the 'comments' page.
Just my thoughts. No I don't go to that page, I suspect the reasons above are why.