News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Measuring GC latencies in Haskell, OCaml, Racket by wyager on Monday December 05, 2016 @03:48PM (#13109382)
It is challenging to deal with functional languages, especially non-strict functional languages, without GC. You can do it to some degree, but it requires some clever and inconvenient limitations on the language. Lifetimes and linear types are two approaches that can help. Clash and lambda-ccc can convert non-monomorphically-recursive Haskell code to a fixed-memory implementation (not even a stack, let alone a heap). Closures, unbounded recursion, and all those other things that make functional programming so convenient often require GC.
Re:Measuring GC latencies in Haskell, OCaml, Racket by ronjouch on Monday December 05, 2016 @04:30PM (#13109837)
Exactly what I was hoping. Thanks for naming these things, names are what those of us without the academic baggage need to be able to investigate/study what we are talking about.