News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How I Wrote the Screenplay for “Arrival” and What I Learn... by coldtea on Sunday December 04, 2016 @10:08PM (#13103118)
Yes, if for some perverse reason you wanted to adopt something that's designed for something else first and foremost (development in the case of an IDE), and are able to tolerate all the non-task-specific functionality that results from that.

Not to mention that lots of popular IDEs are written in unnecessarily wasteful/slow environments (Eclipse and Idea which use Java, etc).

Re:How I Wrote the Screenplay for “Arrival” and What I Learn... by kbenson on Sunday December 04, 2016 @10:46PM (#13103246)
I'm not sure why you seem to think script development is entirely distinct from software development. Perhaps you have some insight into this that I don't, but while there are some obvious differences, I'm willing to bet that a good IDE that's general purpose enough to work for both a lisp and static language and support refactoring and syntax highlighting and interface with external programs like source control would support quite a bit of what's needed already.

As for implementation language, I'm not sure java is significantly slower in the case of the project size we are talking about here.

Re:How I Wrote the Screenplay for “Arrival” and What I Learn... by andrewflnr on Monday December 05, 2016 @02:36AM (#13103944)
I know scripts rely heavily on centering and right alignment. I'm guessing that's not the only way they depend on the assumption of being printed. There would be some impedance mismatch in using tools designd for plain text.
Re:How I Wrote the Screenplay for “Arrival” and What I Learn... by Keyframe on Monday December 05, 2016 @06:47AM (#13104806)
You could write in Fountain syntax http://fountain.io/ and have the presentation be printed as intended. I actually tried that once or twice (short commercial form) in Vim and I didn't have any issues.