News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Improved Authentication for Email Encryption and Security. Parent comment

Re:Improved Authentication for Email Encryption and Security by mark_l_watson on Sunday December 04, 2016 @12:25PM (#13100734)
In a world where both large Internet companies and governments collect meta data, possible collect more than meta data, set up fake cell towers, etc., I think it is naive to not think that they are also collecting statistics on the use of encryption.

Perhaps you misunderstood me?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Improved Authentication for Email Encryption and Security by benevol on Sunday December 04, 2016 @03:21PM (#13101598)
You're basically suggesting that using tools that strengthen democracy is to our disadvantage, because it does not please the government, and that we should therefor not use them to defend our rights. Basically, we should accept being manipulated by fear.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Improved Authentication for Email Encryption and Security by akerl_ on Sunday December 04, 2016 @03:37PM (#13101663)
There is a difference between pointing out how surveillance works and saying it's good.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Improved Authentication for Email Encryption and Security by saberlynx on Monday December 05, 2016 @07:02AM (#13104855)
I use ProtonMail. I'm aware that puts me on a list in all likelihood. Still doing it however. I'm of the opinion that more encrypted private communication between citizens can only be a good thing for freedom even if it enables a few criminals. And I have to do my part.
[ Parent | on HN ]