Re:Brain Computation Is Organized via Power-of-Two-Based Per...
by dkdkdjfjf on Sunday December 04, 2016 @03:35AM
(#13099295)
Would anyone here be able to offer some book suggestions for tackling AI from the neuroscience/ biological perspective, as opposed to the computer science/ computational perspective? I want to expand my horizons.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Brain Computation Is Organized via Power-of-Two-Based Per...
by kurosawa on Sunday December 04, 2016 @06:48AM
(#13099681)
The following suggestion is not about tackling AI from neuroscience/biological perspective, but one that critiques the computational view of mind/brain - which provides only a limited picture.
See the work of prof. Walter Freeman: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Jackson_Freeman_III
Esp: Reclaiming Cognition - Ed. Nunez and Freeman.
Also see the work of Hubert Dreyfus.
These works will help you figure out what 'tackling AI from a neuroscience' perspective could actually mean.
Re:Brain Computation Is Organized via Power-of-Two-Based Per...
by DocSavage on Sunday December 04, 2016 @08:50AM
(#13099970)
I would suggest "Principles of Neural Design", a book that tries to explain why things might be engineered the way they are in biology:
Re:Brain Computation Is Organized via Power-of-Two-Based Per...
by posterboy on Sunday December 04, 2016 @10:36AM
(#13100250)
"explains" and "might" are kind of at odds, here
Re:Brain Computation Is Organized via Power-of-Two-Based Per...
by abrax3141 on Sunday December 04, 2016 @06:04AM
(#13099577)
I don't think anyone serious buys this version of the GUT. You'd be spending your time better reading Randy O'Reilly's work (CU Boulder). Or: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rethinking_Innateness
Re:Brain Computation Is Organized via Power-of-Two-Based Per...
by ThomPete on Sunday December 04, 2016 @06:17AM
(#13099604)
Or Gregory Bateson