News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54 by Oletros on Sunday December 04, 2016 @02:27AM (#13099162)
Why would it work with USA zip codes? Zip codes are not universal...
Re:Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54 by nkkollaw on Sunday December 04, 2016 @03:40AM (#13099301)
Because it's programmed for US zip codes.

So, you can't just enter any zip code in there. There would be clashes since zip codes aren't unique across countries.

Re:Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54 by haar on Sunday December 04, 2016 @05:11AM (#13099468)
Just to be a pedant, that's not what was stated: "As a workaround, you can use your zip code instead.".

Your assumption is that zip code == "U.S zip code" which is a fair assumption if the site only supports the U.S. Other comments on the thread shows the site does support locations outside of the U.S. It is therefore also a fair assumption that it _might_ support similar functionality outside the U.S., kuschku simply tested said assumption and stated that it was incorrect so that other readers were aware.

Re:Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54 by kuschku on Sunday December 04, 2016 @05:49AM (#13099536)
For that use case there's the ISO standard for ZIP codes, as used in paper mail:

Short Country prefix (same as on international car ID plates), then a minus, then the ZIP code.

So, for Germany, D-24107 would be one such code.

Yet, it doesn't handle that either.