News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54 by ausjke on Saturday December 03, 2016 @03:32PM (#13097378)
weather.com uses drupal7 + apache2 + ubuntu + angularjs, not sure why it is that slow, I use weather.com once a while just fine though.
Re:Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54 by true_religion on Saturday December 03, 2016 @04:10PM (#13097506)
It is only because of AngularJS + Ads.

This is a slow down caused by browser rendering/parsing/JS execution. I'm not sure what the server operating system would have to do with it.

Re:Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54 by mschuster91 on Saturday December 03, 2016 @08:46PM (#13098375)
Drupal can be a real PITA to properly set up with caching. If you're running anything above 10 req/s your server is going to melt without. Oh, and it's always worth a try to swap the default search for Elasticsearch, Solr or any other external engine.

That AngularJS is a slow piece of ... is another part. I coded up a simple Twitter client using Cordova with Angular, scrapped and rebuilt it in jQuery with Cordova (was a test if one can actually build a backendless Twitter app). Such speed, many awesome.

I guess many of the "hipster" JS devs use the latest, max-spec macbook/iphone only and totally ignore the rest of ordinary PCs/average Android phone, or they wouldn't dare to touch Angular and friends even with a pole.

Source: operating a couple Drupal instances.

Re:Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54 by ausjke on Saturday December 03, 2016 @09:27PM (#13098500)
Drupal 8 pretty much killed my love for drupal, I'm now switching to wordpress, though I miss drupal's book module in particular.