Re:Crypto 101 – Introductory course on cryptography
by qwertyuiop924 on Friday December 02, 2016 @12:42PM
(#13090630)
Can any crypto people here on HN verify that this gets it right?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Crypto 101 – Introductory course on cryptography
by clifanatic on Friday December 02, 2016 @01:17PM
(#13090906)
I'm the author of the book "Implementing SSL" (https://books.google.com/books?id=LfsC03f8oGsC&printsec=fron..., which covers a lot of the same ground as the link) and consider myself a crypto person - although I haven't had a chance to read every word and check through it with a fine tooth comb, based on what I've had a chance to review, it appears very accurate and very well laid out.
Re:Crypto 101 – Introductory course on cryptography
by gtheodor on Friday December 02, 2016 @03:49PM
(#13092163)
A nitpick: When discussing hash function properties (p. 111), his definition of property #1 ("[it should be hard to] modify a message without changing the hash") is, to me, equivalent to second-preimage resistance ("[Given] a message m, it should be difficult to find another message m' with the same hash"), which he discusses as a separate property under prop #3.
In the explanation of prop #1, he makes it clear that he is talking about the "avalanche effect," so it might be better to say that explicitly in the definition.
Disclaimer: I'm not a crypto person, so it's better if the author comments on this as well.
I think the book is great, by the way, especially the writing style and the choice of what to focus on. Thanks, lvh, for doing this.
Re:Crypto 101 – Introductory course on cryptography
by tptacek on Friday December 02, 2016 @02:16PM
(#13091415)
I'm biased, since LVH is a partner at our new firm, but I've always liked his crypto writing. He's also a trained cryptographer.
Re:Crypto 101 – Introductory course on cryptography
by bogomipz on Friday December 02, 2016 @10:56PM
(#13094202)
Can you elaborate on his being a "trained cryptographer"? I'm not sure what that means.