It's only natural for the government to step in and determine exactly what this means. Allowing the government to do this without limits is problematic, so you balance that out with rights assigned to parents.
It's not an easy question to determine where the line should be drawn but I don't think it's really all that totalitarian to prohibit home schooling. It ensures that children are educated, that they socialize with other children, get confronted with different points of view and gives them the freedom and ability to safely explore the world and themselves in an environment where there parents have much less influence over their lives. It should not be forgotten that not all parents are included to provide that without force.
The data shows that homeschoolers perform better than public school students not only academically, but also on measures of social, emotional and psychological development.
What defense do free citizens have against the ambitions of a government, when they don't have the right to pull their children out of its clutches?
"I think the course presented illustrates well why democratic and republican societies should always prohibit private and home schooling."
Any society that does such things is neither "democratic" nor "republican". It is totalitarian, pretty much by definition.
They're not your children, dude.