News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Court Rules IRS Can Seek Information on Bitcoin Customers. Parent comment

Re:Court Rules IRS Can Seek Information on Bitcoin Customers by existencebox on Thursday December 01, 2016 @02:32AM (#13077847)
I think the (fair) complaint that in situations like this where similar articles are written by a slew of sites, better good could be done sourcing from a site without a paywall; both in accessibility and in supporting non-paywalled news.

Even with the web links, that often doesn't work with WSJ any more with how they cookie; so I'm very supportive of non-paywalled links as a preference.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Court Rules IRS Can Seek Information on Bitcoin Customers by grzm on Thursday December 01, 2016 @02:39AM (#13077882)
That's a good idea, especially for those that are essentially publishing the wire stories. If people find them, they can provide them in the comments, or perhaps submit them separately. Hard to tell sometimes if there's a better one out there.

I've heard people describe problems they have with the WSJ web links. I don't deny that they do, but I'm surprised I haven't seen them myself. I'm just running Safari with Ghostery. Never had an issue with WSJ (and I don't have a subscription).

[ Parent | on HN ]