News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Standardized Ladder of Functional Programming [pdf] by runT1ME on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @02:22AM (#13069071)
>So when I see a list like this, I find it hard to imagine how "Profunctor Optics" is what Zynga (or any company I've worked at) needed to be successful.

I mean, by that criteria, why learn anything?

The world is not just startups btw, I work on products that have very very defined requirements. Hell, sometimes I'm implementing an RFC. FP is a huge win for us, and yes i've used profunctor optics in a high performance network application.

Re:Standardized Ladder of Functional Programming [pdf] by a_imho on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @03:12AM (#13069223)
>I mean, by that criteria, why learn anything?

This might be tongue in cheek, but I agree with the parent. Engineering excellence will not further your career much, companies tend to oversell meritocracy. Salaries flat out quickly, and there is a huge supply of good enough developers, if you step out of the line too much.

Re:Standardized Ladder of Functional Programming [pdf] by runT1ME on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @01:23PM (#13073213)
> Salaries flat out quickly

What other professions besides lawyers or doctors regularly have a 3 or 4x range for salaries of people more or less with the same job description?

Re:Standardized Ladder of Functional Programming [pdf] by a_imho on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @04:32PM (#13074877)
In addition to those? Actors, musicians, sport people. In the office? Managers. Hence the advice, focus on soft skills. I would wager the top 1% on the developer track earn nowhere near to the top 10% on the managerial track. And your best bet is to regularly change jobs otherwise good luck getting anything more than a 5-10% increase, while managerial salaries and bonuses scale with the size of the organization. Also, there is a lot to be said about the difficulty of the work.