If that supposed 1%er (all else being equal like negotiating skill, personality, etc.) is making less money or receiving less respect, then yes, that's a fair perspective.

shouldn't the 1%er move up rather than criticise the rest down?

I mean by definition there are only so many 1%ers to go around to fill up top spots.

In theory yes, but the world isn't strictly meritocratic. Age, school (or lack thereof), social connections, height, attractiveness, clothing style, voice, accent, social class, birthplace, medical conditions, and other non-work-related attributes can still affect a person's achievements.