Re:China approves $36B railway plan for Jing-Jin-Ji megacity
by hx87 on Monday November 28, 2016 @05:29PM
(#13058999)
The US has to transport goods and people longer distances, so all other things being equal US transportation will be more energy intensive. However, having the US switch over to the German mode of transportation, where goods move on trucks and people move on rails, will make the system more, not less energy intensive since goods contribute more ton-miles than people.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:China approves $36B railway plan for Jing-Jin-Ji megacity
by thatfrenchguy on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @04:38AM
(#13061945)
Freight lines and passenger lines are usually (though not always) different, especially on the country-side where you have no electrification for freight lines and HSR-dedicated lines.
Re:China approves $36B railway plan for Jing-Jin-Ji megacity
by hx87 on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @11:09AM
(#13063908)
In the USA, all passenger rail outside the northeast is not electrified and freight lines are a strict superset of passenger lines.
Re:China approves $36B railway plan for Jing-Jin-Ji megacity
by honkhonkpants on Monday November 28, 2016 @05:53PM
(#13059144)
I still think you are presenting a false choice. It isn't necessary for the US to put goods on trucks in order for us to put people on trains. Nobody today drives their cars from the coal field in Gillette, Wyoming to the electric power plant in Montrose, Missouri. Adding trains for people will not somehow make the coal-hauling railroads of America more congested or less effective.