Re:Modern C [pdf]
by sidlls on Monday November 28, 2016 @01:18PM
(#13057278)
What's amusing to me is the amount of terribly unsafe code (that isn't C) that powers rockets, moon landers, and a variety of other safety-critical systems and yet isn't the subject of such persistent and severe criticisms. There's a reason C and C++ are targets. My (obviously controversial) opinion is it has at least as much to do with ego as a desire for safety.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
As far as I know most space software these days, and embedded in general, is in (at least a sub/superset of) C.
Yes, but it wasn't always, and still isn't always.
Although your point is very good in that it weakens (further) the "safety is everything" argument. In my opinion. There is so much mission critical software today that is written in C and C++. That's one reason why "safety, safety, safety!" just isn't as persuasive to me as it perhaps is to others.
Re:Modern C [pdf]
by ArkyBeagle on Monday November 28, 2016 @06:19PM
(#13059292)
We have a winner. Kill your ego. It's the only way.