News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Modern C [pdf] by quickben on Monday November 28, 2016 @08:33AM (#13055252)
Eh, no need to overreact that much. Look. Hardware is hardware, and this is where tire meets the road so people can lay the foundation for the upper levels.

It is what it is. It's not user friendly because hardware just isn't, low levels aren't, and it has to just perform.

> 'idiotically dangerous'

Well, I don't want to sound harsh, but nobody forces anybody to do systems programming if they perceive C as such. There is JavaScript, python and plethora of other safe and cozy languages, but: the low level has to be done.

Re:Modern C [pdf] by yxhuvud on Monday November 28, 2016 @08:44AM (#13055318)
Hardware is hardware, but C is not. People need to stop pretending that it is.
Re:Modern C [pdf] by nurettin on Monday November 28, 2016 @10:51AM (#13056156)
Look at all his comments in this thread. He is just fishing for an argument/attention.
Re:Modern C [pdf] by grabcocque on Monday November 28, 2016 @08:36AM (#13055272)
Oh, I see it's not that there's such a thing as a bad tool, or that C is unsafe.

Simply most of us don't have your towering intellect to appreciate it. Got it.

Re:Modern C [pdf] by quickben on Monday November 28, 2016 @08:40AM (#13055300)
Maybe I was too harsh, I apologize. But c is far less dangerous than a kitchen knife.

Tools are tools, some are used with a great amount of care: jackhammers, routers, compression hammers, chainsaws etc.

Heck: driving a vehicle is probably the single most dangerous activity we do on a daily basis.