News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by tgb on Saturday November 26, 2016 @02:13PM (#13045367)
Good point, but I'm afraid the analogy still isn't spelled out enough for me to actually make sense of it. Like why does that make a horizontal/vertical discrepancy?
Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by cperciva on Saturday November 26, 2016 @02:29PM (#13045428)
If you move horizontally, you're getting closer to one satellite and further away from another -- the changes in GPS signals add, just like if something you're looking at moves from side to side. If you move vertically, you're getting closer to or further away from all the satellites at once; but since GPS relies on the differences between signal arrival times, that's much harder to pick up.
Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by tgb on Saturday November 26, 2016 @10:33PM (#13047535)
Thanks I think that's the best explanation I've read!
Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by cperciva on Sunday November 27, 2016 @12:53AM (#13047951)
Thanks! It's unfortunate that the diagram on wikipedia is actively misleading since it corresponds to known distances rather than known differences of distances.