News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fidel Castro has died by sooheon on Saturday November 26, 2016 @03:02AM (#13042426)
It's only a fallacy if it is being employed to absolve Castro of every crime. I think the point of the comparison was to remind pots not to call kettles black.
Re:Fidel Castro has died by pmarreck on Saturday November 26, 2016 @09:31AM (#13043617)
What makes you think it requires a total absolution to be tu quoque? If I murder 100 people and punch a grandma, and I point out it was OK to punch a grandma because I just saw YOU do it, it's still tu quoque despite the fact that nobody discussed the 100 I murdered
Re:Fidel Castro has died by coldtea on Sunday November 27, 2016 @03:46AM (#13048344)
Only the argument is that the US has cause much much much greater mayhem than Castro, domestically AND globally, and yet it has the gal to take the hollier than thou stance.

Heck, US cops alone have probably killed much more people than the Cuban regime in those 50 years. And the place with 25% of the world's prisoners and 4% of the world's population is rich to call other places "police states".

Re:Fidel Castro has died by sooheon on Saturday November 26, 2016 @12:05PM (#13044625)
> ...and I point out it was OK... because I just saw YOU do it...

This is tu quoque, because you're trying to say bad thing you did was OK because someone else did a bad thing too. However, you'll notice the above poster definitely did not claim what Castro did was OK.