News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by brogrammernot on Friday November 25, 2016 @10:14AM (#13037243)
I worked in business litigation for a few years and I obviously can't go into any specifics but you'd be shocked/surprised at the number of buildings that the plans say X but somehow Y happened....
Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by brianwawok on Friday November 25, 2016 @10:40AM (#13037423)
Owned a condo. Code and plans said to install a drain clean out in the main sewer line. Cost to builder? Maybe $20. Done wrong and closed up, no one knew so he got away.

Few years later, maybe 10k in damages and 5k to fix. All so the builder could save $20.

Things like this x 100 are everywhere. This is why building codes are nice, although people complain about them.

Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by rcthompson on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:08PM (#13038658)
I had a friend whose bathtub drain was attached to nothing at all. It just spilled out into the space below the apartment. When they opened out up, they're was a giant subterranean pond hollowed out by years of water pouring out onto the ground.
Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by astrodust on Friday November 25, 2016 @03:09PM (#13039472)
Shades of Arrested Development.
Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by arethuza on Friday November 25, 2016 @10:49AM (#13037496)
Even basics like "does the person/company building something own the land it is built on" can go horribly wrong.

Edit: Here in Scotland if someone builds something on your land then it belongs to you and you are under no obligation to warn them of this fact!

Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by brianwawok on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:51AM (#13037969)
Yah there is that. In the US, it is usually mandated that you get something called "title insurance". There are different levels depending who it protects (lender vs buyer). If down the line it turns out you don't own the land your house is on, the title insurance company does lawsuit magic or somehow pays to make the lender whole.

End up costing ?? $1,000 or so per real estate transaction. 99.9999% of the time pays back zero. I suppose nice to have for the last .0001%.

Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by alasdair_ on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:42PM (#13038916)
We had to use ours. What happened is that the title people didn't realise the guy selling us the house had two properties and they paid off the wrong house.

Then the guy sold his (newly paid off) house and disappeared.

The first time we leaned anything was amiss was when we had an eviction notice posted on our door. The title company didn't bother telling us until it got that far.

It caused a whole bunch of problems and the company kept dragging their feet hoping someone else would pay. It took a lawyer and threat of a suit to get them to finally pay out.

Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by joezydeco on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:52AM (#13037976)
Codes don't mean squat if the inspector doesn't or won't catch violations on the closeout.
Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by brianwawok on Friday November 25, 2016 @03:04PM (#13039446)
Not sure the value add of that statement.

Clearly some codes do work, and the average building has less issues because of codes.

Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by joezydeco on Friday November 25, 2016 @09:01PM (#13041284)
The value add is saying that codes are important, but enforcement is just as important. Perhaps moreso because if you skip the latter, the former doesn't mean anything at all.

If the builder skimped on the $20 cleanout, it should have been noticed by the building inspector.

Re:Satellites Confirm Sinking of San Francisco's Millennium ... by dghughes on Friday November 25, 2016 @04:24PM (#13039954)
And the building code means the minimum code required not the maximum. A builder can make it better if they want to when they are building a structure.