News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cassandra is not row level consistent by helper on Thursday November 24, 2016 @07:55PM (#13033766)
I personally wouldn't use redis for anything besides a cache.
Re:Cassandra is not row level consistent by fgasparini on Thursday November 24, 2016 @08:50PM (#13033924)
Why not? It has a WAL persisted to disk at a desired interval. It provides the same durability levels of most databases.

http://redis.io/topics/persistence

Re:Cassandra is not row level consistent by helper on Thursday November 24, 2016 @09:25PM (#13034028)
Let me be clear, I think redis is a well engineered piece of software and I have been constantly impressed with the way antirez runs the project.

Specifically for the question of a locking service, I need more availability than what a single node can offer. I'm not sure if you are advocating for using redis cluster as a locking service, but since it intentionally doesn't offer write safety during a partition that does not seem advisable.

Re:Cassandra is not row level consistent by SEJeff on Thursday November 24, 2016 @09:58PM (#13034131)