News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Cassandra is not row level consistent. Parent comment

Re:Cassandra is not row level consistent by chungtg on Thursday November 24, 2016 @07:11PM (#13033631)
Datastax seems to think that it is a good idea: http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/consensus-on-cassandra
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cassandra is not row level consistent by user5994461 on Thursday November 24, 2016 @07:15PM (#13033646)
That piece was written in 2014, which was a different time ;)

Plus, if we were to take the vendor words at face value, we'd all be using Docker and MongoDB in production.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cassandra is not row level consistent by djsumdog on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:20AM (#13034696)
I work for a large company that used docker in production. A lot of companies are. There are a lot of big names using Kubernetes, Mesos or some other container orchestration system.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cassandra is not row level consistent by ddorian43 on Friday November 25, 2016 @04:07AM (#13035276)
Just like many companies use mongodb and nanoservices.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cassandra is not row level consistent by flurdy on Friday November 25, 2016 @05:58AM (#13035826)
:) My last client (very, very big client) for the past year ran nearly all their production systems with Docker and MongoDb...

Never had any problems with Docker. MongoDB on the other hand... Suffice to say it is really fragile when spread across multiple datacentres, which is probably not a surprise to HN.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cassandra is not row level consistent by pkolaczk on Friday November 25, 2016 @07:12AM (#13036157)
Details matter. All updates in the Datastax post are protected by LWT. That code is correct. The OP's code was wrong, because he was mixing non-LWT updates.
[ Parent | on HN ]