News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why squared error? (2014) by _Wintermute on Thursday November 24, 2016 @03:50PM (#13032667)
Yes we still need statistics. There is a huge overlap between machine learning methods and applied statistics, so much so that often there is not a clear distinction between the two.
Re:Why squared error? (2014) by j1vms on Thursday November 24, 2016 @05:46PM (#13033275)
> between machine learning methods and applied statistics (...) often there is not a clear distinction between the two.

I would say applied statistics draws a line just prior to implementation concerns (say, real-world resource usage measured in time, space and energy) whereas these would be fully within scope and of interest in machine learning.

As an example, applied statistics could provide a useful approach to a vision/image recognition problem, and this approach might be provably unrealizable in practice using real-world execution units (e.g. CUDA cores). Nonetheless, it might still be a very worthwhile theoretical result in applied statistics, although of no immediate interest within ML except to hint at potential new area of research.