Re:Schiaparelli landing investigation makes progress
by ethbro on Thursday November 24, 2016 @08:21AM
(#13030179)
There's some room between "sensor fusion is fragile enough that if a physical condition persists for an unexpected amount of time the craft is lost" and "all sensor faults can be handled."
Notably, this obviously wasn't a failure case they programmed for. But it does seem a pretty fragile system to throw across the solar system in retrospect.
>The first thing to do was to try to seal up the hole. This turned out to be impossible, because the ship’s sensors couldn’t see that there was a hole, and the supervisors, which should have said that the sensors weren’t working properly, weren’t working properly and kept saying that the sensors were fine. The ship could only deduce the existence of the hole from the fact that the robots had clearly fallen out of it, taking its spare brain-which would have enabled it to see the hole-with them.
You could stack layer upon layer of fault detecting modules and supervising software and error and redundancy modules, but then you'd probably wind up with something like Dark Star's Bomb 20:
>Unfortunately, Doolittle has mistakenly taught the bomb Cartesian doubt and, as a result, Bomb #20 determines that it can only trust itself and not external input. Convinced that only it exists, and that its sole purpose in life is to explode, Bomb #20 states "Let there be light," and promptly detonates.