Yes, nuclear power has problems. But even if it killed 24,000 people per year, blocking the replacement of coal by nuclear would still be a willful choice to cause the deaths of 1,000 people (it's getting really hard not to say murder).
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalworker's_pneumoconiosis
There is no conceivable way of removing even daily worldwide human carbon waste from the atmosphere for that kind of money.
Sure the physical size of a spent fuel might be 'small' but this is not the only issue.
And the low level waste - of which there is approx 360000 tons? Would the Mariana Trench would be a good/safe place to place this? Based on what reckoning?
>> And the low level waste - of which there is approx 360000 tons? Would the Mariana Trench would be a good/safe place to place this? Based on what reckoning?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_disposal_of_radioactive_...
Chernobyl isn't hypothetical. And neither is Fukushima. And those weren't as bad as they could have been.
And we still don't know what to do with all the waste we have.