Again, but with different words: you could have written exactly the same original comment without having read the article, because it doesn't touch on the article at all. What you did --- again --- was to dismiss one of the world's foremost authorities on election security as a leftist partisan. This is exactly what 'dang is talking about when he asks commenters not to take threads on generic ideological tangents. Please stop.

You are welcome to disagree with Halderman! But before you try, you should acquaint yourself with his point, which is not that the election was stolen from Clinton, or even hacked at all.