News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: GitPlex – A new Git repo management server with ... by TeMPOraL on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @04:00AM (#13021201)
I'm thinking in terms of what I'd do if the code was printed out on paper.

http://imgur.com/KMCBMjA

Re:Show HN: GitPlex – A new Git repo management server with ... by oneeyedpigeon on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @04:56AM (#13021418)
The trouble with that is, how on earth do you get the annotations to apply across revisions? Or would you be OK with them only applying to a given revision and then ... what, disappearing? Or going into a 'floating bucket' of annotations for the entire file?
Re:Show HN: GitPlex – A new Git repo management server with ... by TeMPOraL on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @05:07AM (#13021458)
I'd be fine with them sticking to particular lines of code[0] and disappearing if those lines were changed. This is not something I'd like to commit into codebase, it's for exploration / preparing work.

--

[0] - "smart stick" can be implemented by remembering not just the line in file, but also the contents of that line and a (fuzzy) context.

Re:Show HN: GitPlex – A new Git repo management server with ... by oneeyedpigeon on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @05:27AM (#13021535)
Interesting. In these terms, it could probably just be a totally separate, general-purpose 'text file annotation' tool with git support (but not a requirement).
Re:Show HN: GitPlex – A new Git repo management server with ... by robinshen on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @06:39AM (#13021826)
Sticky comment is actually another form of git blame, and will be available in future versions of GitPlex.
Re:Show HN: GitPlex – A new Git repo management server with ... by leonya2 on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @06:31AM (#13021784)
Upsource has sticky comments that survive code changes well.