News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com by serge2k on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @08:10PM (#13019116)
because stalling shipments of food or medical supplies is a big problem.

because you could be costing companies that have no direct relation to the dispute lots of money.

So the courts have some power to say no, get back to work. if the conditions are that bad the employees can still counter this by quitting.

Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com by quickben on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @11:41PM (#13020087)
"stalling food and medical supplies"

That's what the employer knowingly brought into risk when they decided to run understaffed to increase profits.

Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com by Pyxl101 on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @03:59AM (#13021199)
That's risk that the transportation provider brought. The medical company ordering supplies from some other company, who happens to use this transportation provider some of the time but not all the time, was not aware of and could not have reasonably foreseen this risk.
Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com by tehwebguy on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @07:34AM (#13022133)
There are surely indemnity clauses all the way upstream. There are plenty of next day shipping options from 3 national carriers, plus same day options and just putting someone on a flight.
Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com by bertiewhykovich on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @09:04PM (#13019372)
As Matt Bruenig has noted, the BATNA for many workers is dire poverty. Quitting isn't that easy.