News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com by more_corn on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @06:59PM (#13018773)
Please stop posting paywalled articles. There are all kinds of arguments for paying for quality news and whatever, but I'll never pay for WSJ and I simply don't care enough to bother with circumvention. If people want to try the paywall thing let them build the wall. Lets stop peeking over the top though shall we?
Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com by ksk on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @07:17PM (#13018867)
I kind of agree with you but I am not sure of the principle at play here. Because I wonder how that would apply if we gave equal status to all outputs of human labor. For e.g. You need to spend money to buy a macbook, so why link to a review? Or you need to buy a book to read it, so why should comments be able to link to a book? etc etc. OTOH we could simply downvote and move on? :)
Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com by cypherpunks01 on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @10:22PM (#13019703)
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10178989

I do wish that paywall articles could be tagged as such though.

Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com by yohoho22 on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @11:29PM (#13020019)
Maybe if there was a little more encouragement of non-paywalled submissions, where possible?

Here's a Bloomberg article that seems to cover mostly the same ground as this WSJ piece, for example: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-22/pilot-str...

Sometimes the WSJ or NYT or whoever just has something to offer that others do not. In many cases, though, it seems like there's other paywall-free reporting that could work basically as well.

Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com by ams6110 on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @11:23PM (#13019982)