Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com
by more_corn on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @06:59PM
(#13018773)
Please stop posting paywalled articles. There are all kinds of arguments for paying for quality news and whatever, but I'll never pay for WSJ and I simply don't care enough to bother with circumvention. If people want to try the paywall thing let them build the wall. Lets stop peeking over the top though shall we?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com
by ksk on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @07:17PM
(#13018867)
I kind of agree with you but I am not sure of the principle at play here. Because I wonder how that would apply if we gave equal status to all outputs of human labor. For e.g. You need to spend money to buy a macbook, so why link to a review? Or you need to buy a book to read it, so why should comments be able to link to a book? etc etc. OTOH we could simply downvote and move on? :)
Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com
by cypherpunks01 on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @10:22PM
(#13019703)
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10178989
I do wish that paywall articles could be tagged as such though.
Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com
by yohoho22 on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @11:29PM
(#13020019)
Maybe if there was a little more encouragement of non-paywalled submissions, where possible?
Here's a Bloomberg article that seems to cover mostly the same ground as this WSJ piece, for example: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-22/pilot-str...
Sometimes the WSJ or NYT or whoever just has something to offer that others do not. In many cases, though, it seems like there's other paywall-free reporting that could work basically as well.
Re:Pilots Strike at Cargo Carrier Serving DHL, Amazon.com
by ams6110 on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @11:23PM
(#13019982)
Here's the story from another source:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-air-transport-sr-strike-id...