Re:No Evidence of Aloe Vera Found in the Aloe Vera at Wal-Ma...
by nickik on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @06:23PM
(#13018582)
That goes in the right direction but there are many problem that hinder it from scaling.
A organisation can not buy millions of claims from consumers and the fight a full class action lawsuit without any of these people being involve.
Re:No Evidence of Aloe Vera Found in the Aloe Vera at Wal-Ma...
by mzw_mzw on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @08:12PM
(#13019124)
When you can buy and sell a legal action like that it strikes me as a super bad idea. Wouldn't there be some legal equivalent of the patent trolls who today purchase outdated patents and then go around filing nuisance suits based on them?
Re:No Evidence of Aloe Vera Found in the Aloe Vera at Wal-Ma...
by nommm-nommm on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @06:41PM
(#13018667)
You make no sense.
If you want to sue CVS for selling you fake aloe go ahead, it costs less than $100 to file a small claims case in my state and CVS will very likely settle with you outside of court because it's cheaper than sending someone to court to defend the company.
Re:No Evidence of Aloe Vera Found in the Aloe Vera at Wal-Ma...
by nickik on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @07:03PM
(#13018796)
Today you can not buy up a hole group of claims and make a collective action suit on behave of the other people. That is not legal.
There are many other problems with the courts that make the system I proposed currently impossible.
Re:No Evidence of Aloe Vera Found in the Aloe Vera at Wal-Ma...
by nommm-nommm on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @08:40PM
(#13019253)
Class action suits are actually legal.
This exists, it's called small claims court.