News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What I wish a Ruby programmer had told me one year ago.. by Sirupsen on Wednesday April 28, 2010 @09:53AM (#1301531)
I'm sorry if you feel like I point them towards my "pet OS". I should have stated more clearly there are other alternatives, and this only is my opinion.
Re:What I wish a Ruby programmer had told me one year ago.. by hvs on Wednesday April 28, 2010 @02:12PM (#1302228)
What does Arch Linux have to do with developing Ruby?
Re:What I wish a Ruby programmer had told me one year ago.. by blasdel on Wednesday April 28, 2010 @02:29PM (#1302288)
Don't have to wait 6 months and upgrade everything to get slightly newer versions of packages. The packages are pretty direct from upstream instead of being patched and split apart by the distro.
Re:What I wish a Ruby programmer had told me one year ago.. by blacksmythe on Wednesday April 28, 2010 @11:32AM (#1301776)
What advantages does Arch Linux have over Ubuntu?
Re:What I wish a Ruby programmer had told me one year ago.. by dho on Wednesday April 28, 2010 @12:00PM (#1301849)
Re:What I wish a Ruby programmer had told me one year ago.. by Macha on Wednesday April 28, 2010 @03:27PM (#1302448)
The main one: Packages don't end up 6 (or more) months out of date between updates.

The maybe a advantage (if you agree with the OP)/maybe a disadvantage(if you like me, don't): Much more manual configuration.

Re:What I wish a Ruby programmer had told me one year ago.. by foldr on Wednesday April 28, 2010 @10:44PM (#1303430)
Been a while since I used Ubuntu, but you can typically install newer packages from pre-release versions. You're not locked in to the 6 month upgrade cycle.

I think it's a pretty good model. For 90% of the installed software there's really no reason to update packages more than every 6 months.

Re:What I wish a Ruby programmer had told me one year ago.. by Sirupsen on Wednesday April 28, 2010 @12:03PM (#1301857)
Read at Dho's link. My primary reason for the switch was that I wanted to learn more about Linux.