Re:Mastering Time-to-Market with Haskell
by vog on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @11:35AM
(#13015229)
> The good news is that this doesn't have to be a dichotomy. You can have GC for in-memory data structures and deterministic destruction for everything else
That's very interesting. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this is not the final solution, either, because you still have the GC running, which prevents strict proofs about performance e.g. for real-time systems. Here, the Rust approach has benefits as it enables you to get very far without a GC.
That's very interesting. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this is not the final solution, either, because you still have the GC running, which prevents strict proofs about performance e.g. for real-time systems. Here, the Rust approach has benefits as it enables you to get very far without a GC.