News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Debian considers merging /usr by kbenson on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @02:49AM (#13012405)
Originally, disks weren't that big, and / was meant to house what was required to boot and run a minimal system, and additional software was installed in /usr, often on one or more different disks. There's some additional benefit to running a separate /usr partition, which is that you can mount / as read-only for some additional security (but not much, IMO).
Re:Debian considers merging /usr by rodgerd on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @03:17AM (#13012545)
Originally /usr was the user data. Then the disks got full and someone stuck binaries into it. Then people moved to /u, /usr2, /home, or whatever your ix variant (or site) wanted for user data.

The ix file system standards are the retcons of a bunch of hacks made by sysadmins trying to stave off users with pitchforks. Philosophy my arse.

Re:Debian considers merging /usr by B1FF_PSUVM on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @04:58AM (#13012978)
Eh, the seminal BOfH story: "AH! - You haven't got any files"

(Here: http://bofh.bjash.com/bofh/genesis2.html )