News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tell HN: Riseup.net fails to update canary; fingerprints ... by acqq on Monday November 21, 2016 @02:32PM (#13008395)
Maybe it's worth checking their feed before writing?
Re:Tell HN: Riseup.net fails to update canary; fingerprints ... by Bartweiss on Monday November 21, 2016 @02:57PM (#13008597)
That's the problem with canaries, though. By definition, they exist for situations where the canary-owner can't offer positive evidence for compromised security.

I don't particularly think Riseup is in that position, but unless someone actively says "don't worry about our lack of a canary, we took it down for $REASONS and all is well", negative evidence is all you can react to.

Re:Tell HN: Riseup.net fails to update canary; fingerprints ... by mirimir on Monday November 21, 2016 @02:48PM (#13008520)
It could have been an attempt at plausible deniability.
Re:Tell HN: Riseup.net fails to update canary; fingerprints ... by acqq on Monday November 21, 2016 @03:07PM (#13008674)
Have you happened to see their other messages from the same day?

"Dear friends, please remember that internet is not always the answer..."

"by the way, that wasn't a trump related tweet..."

"listen to the hummingbird, whose wings you cannot see, listen to the hummingbird, don't listen to me. #LeonardCohen"

It all "has nothing to do with" canaries.