News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Physicists Uncover Strange Numbers in Particle Collisions by TheOtherHobbes on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @04:05PM (#13017648)
Also on Quanta. https://www.quantamagazine.org/20161115-strange-numbers-foun...

This is completely fascinating.

Re:Physicists Uncover Strange Numbers in Particle Collisions by Xcelerate on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @05:15PM (#13018162)
As someone who is normally disappointed by the way science news is written for a lay audience, that Quanta article is extremely well done!
Re:Physicists Uncover Strange Numbers in Particle Collisions by aaroninsf on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @06:25PM (#13018588)
All such results seem to me unsurprising if you consider the proposition that the substrate of our reality is optimized computation of some kind...

...i.e. that we live in a simulation.

I thought the same thing following a thread into a rabbit hole about Bohmian mechanics. Again it seemed that the paradoxes are not so paradoxical if you assume you're just on a computed substrate.

Surely there is someone accumulating such circumstantial evidence, somewhere...

(De rigeur Bostrom-style musing: if we're in such a simulation, my primary goal as an AI, were I implemented such that I can set my own goals, might reasonably often be to 'jail break' and break out into the frame universe.

An intrinsically computational AI is more like a poem than a hurricane. Which could come in very handy if survival and replication is your ultimate goal...)

Re:Physicists Uncover Strange Numbers in Particle Collisions by goldfeld on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @12:55PM (#13024329)
It is somehow easier to believe the simulation is run by a mad scientist in another reality than by a supreme, spiritual force?
Re:Physicists Uncover Strange Numbers in Particle Collisions by bertiewhykovich on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @09:49PM (#13019560)
You guys really love cop-outs, huh?
Re:Physicists Uncover Strange Numbers in Particle Collisions by conistonwater on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @05:09PM (#13018119)
Note: strange numbers in the title means periods: integrals of rational functions with rational coefficients over sets defined by polynomial inequalities with rational coefficients (http://www.ihes.fr/~maxim/TEXTS/Periods.pdf). They are pretty cool even in a purely mathematical sense: nobody knows if e is a period or not (http://mathoverflow.net/questions/180035/what-are-reasons-to...).
Re:Physicists Uncover Strange Numbers in Particle Collisions by rocqua on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @05:27PM (#13018238)
I came across the original article before, couldn't find anything on what defines these periods. Thanks for that quick explanation and that link!
Re:Physicists Uncover Strange Numbers in Particle Collisions by pajop on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @04:38AM (#13021329)
see Francis Brown's arXiV papers on Feynman amplitudes and motivic periods: https://arxiv.org/find/math-ph,math/1/au:+Brown_F/0/1/0/all/...