Re:Quit Social Media, Your Career May Depend on It
by craftandhustle on Sunday November 20, 2016 @02:03PM
(#13000482)
I follow a very similar pattern here on HN. One thing I've been thinking about lately is that I always read the comments first and only sometimes visit the link. The links act as topics that allow for discussion more than an end/reward in and of themselves (like on reddit for example). I'm always interested in hearing domain expertise, anecdotes, opinions, etc from the HN crowd which is, admittedly, much different than my active social circle.
Re:Quit Social Media, Your Career May Depend on It
by Reedx on Sunday November 20, 2016 @04:24PM
(#13001322)
Spot on. That's a good way of looking at it - that the links act as topics. The comments are definitely the main value proposition (and addiction) for me.
This was true with Slashdot as well, now that I think about it. Back in the day it had the same draw for the same reasons. Though I think HN is a better version, since it doesn't have a few editors driving it like /. did, which was often frustrating.
Re:Quit Social Media, Your Career May Depend on It
by brokenmasonjars on Sunday November 20, 2016 @06:20PM
(#13001850)
I don't think I'm as addicted to HN. I use to be pretty bad with facebook and ...oh god..sigh..myspace..but I think there was a point sometime in 2009 where I just felt my use had to be curtailed. Reddit naturally replaced facebook and I was pretty addicted to that as well. Reddit was probably the most difficult to curtail mainly because as I was earning my phd I belonged to some subs on the specific topics I was studying and found the stuff being posted to be relative to what I was studying. Post-PhD and what not, I use a new account there and don't really post much. I prefer to check in later in the day along with HN to catch some of the interesting reads and read up on the responses in the comments. But usually that's only after I've taken my lunesta and am winding down for bed.
Re:Quit Social Media, Your Career May Depend on It
by _audakel on Sunday November 20, 2016 @03:46PM
(#13001106)
I think all SM has good and bad parts. It's all addictive to some degree or another or it wouldn't be widely used. I think the addiction in hn is not the articles but the comments
Re:Quit Social Media, Your Career May Depend on It
by sean_patel on Sunday November 20, 2016 @07:39PM
(#13002230)
> I think all SM has good and bad parts.
Correct. But like Professor Ted Kaczynski stated in his "Technology Manifesto"
> The bad parts of technology cannot be separated from the good parts.
This here is pretty much applicable to everything online, not just SM. Example: FaceBook and Twitter are used to organize protests, break news, reconnect with lost loved ones. The same technology sites are also used to recruit terr_ists, phish and spam seniors and unsuspecting people, troll and commit felony crimes etc...
Re:Quit Social Media, Your Career May Depend on It
by tedmiston on Sunday November 20, 2016 @12:09PM
(#12999833)
I have replaced (2) with Shift-Click, which is Add to Reading List on a story link in Safari. It works better to preserve attention for me. I end up not reading 90%+ of what sounded interesting from the front page on first glance.
Re:Quit Social Media, Your Career May Depend on It
by frostymarvelous on Sunday November 20, 2016 @02:42PM
(#13000723)
Similar pattern but on mobile. Now chrome doesn't bother with the tab count, just a ':D'
HN is the one where I find myself checking several times/day and I constantly have 20+ HN tabs. The pattern is something like this:
1) "Oh, interesting topic!"
2) Open in a tab
3) Read existing comments & the link (I don't always do the latter, admittedly)
4) Come back N hours later, read new comments
5) Repeat #4 over a day or two
6) Close tab unless I haven't read the link yet. If I haven't, then they tend to stick around until I do or send it off into OneTab for ultimate procrastination.