Re:Constexpr-8cc: Compile-time C Compiler
by matthewaveryusa on Friday November 18, 2016 @04:49PM
(#12990357)
I don't find auto, lambda, and variadic templates, move semantics and smart pointers to be bolted on. You can write Fortran in any language.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
You think rvalue references are a natural and elegant construct? That if C++ were designed with move semantics in mind, this is the road they would have travelled down?
Re:Constexpr-8cc: Compile-time C Compiler
by kinghajj on Friday November 18, 2016 @11:24PM
(#12992061)
That's the biggest reason that I like Rust more than C++, even more than lifetime/safety. I've been working on a C++14 application, and "std::move" shows up a lot more than implicit copies, which not only makes the code more verbose, but analyzing performance more difficult. (I so wish I could be using Rust, but, unfortunately, the only FOSS DNP3 implementation is in C++.)