News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Automated Pro-Trump Bots Overwhelmed Pro-Clinton Messages by wyager on Friday November 18, 2016 @11:29AM (#12987891)
Jesus Christ, he's not saying Twitter broke the law, he's saying that the article (which is about internet groups helping candidates) ignored a number of powerful internet groups helping candidates.

I swear, every time someone brings up twitter's political censorship, there's at least one comment to the effect of "they're allowed to!" or "if you don't like it, you can leave!". Yes, everyone knows! We're talking about the morality, outcome, or effectiveness of twitter doing such a thing, not whether or not they're entitled to do it.

Re:Automated Pro-Trump Bots Overwhelmed Pro-Clinton Messages by rm_-rf_slash on Friday November 18, 2016 @11:46AM (#12988036)
Agreed. The whole point of morals and ethics is to establish a code of behavior that defines what is or is not ok to do even if it's not against the law.

There isn't a law that forbids people from gossiping about others behind their backs but most of us can generally agree that it's simply something that decent people should not do.

Re:Automated Pro-Trump Bots Overwhelmed Pro-Clinton Messages by return0 on Friday November 18, 2016 @11:52AM (#12988096)
I was playing devil's advocate in that comment. Sadly it got upvoted. Twitter 's mission is to "watch events unfold, in real time, from every angle". It has no business in manipulation. There are 2 social media monopolies and they play increasingly important roles in our democracies. If they keep using their power to manipulate people, people will demand their regulation. How can this be? maybe open up their data channels so competitors can enter the space.