News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Police raid Gizmodo editor's house by mbreese on Tuesday April 27, 2010 @10:54AM (#1298382)
>If you lose a phone in the public you should expect that any secrets become public

So, if you lost your wallet, it would be okay if I then knew your credit card numbers? Even if I didn't use them? I promise not to tell...

This isn't clamoring for a police state. It's recognizing that when property is lost, regardless of how, it still belongs to the person who lost it. I'm normally not one for "corporate rights", but in this case it doesn't matter that the entity that owned the phone was Apple. Hell, it could have been the next gen Blueberry (yes, I meant Blueberry) for all I care.

Re:Police raid Gizmodo editor's house by johSho7w on Tuesday April 27, 2010 @11:22AM (#1298488)
If you lose your wallet and assume that credit card numbers are not compromised you're an idiot.

Are you saying Gizmodo refused to return the phone to Apple claiming it was now their own property? Or that Gizmodo demanded reimbursement from Apple in exchange for returning the phone?