News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pixel Security by Klathmon on Thursday November 17, 2016 @06:05PM (#12982616)
Is that a common thing? Being able to send your device back to the manufacturer for user inflicted issues for repair?

I can't say I've ever done that with any product ever...

Re:Pixel Security by r1ch on Thursday November 17, 2016 @06:30PM (#12982809)
It's quite common. HTC even advertise it as something you can do for free: http://www.htc.com/us/uh-oh-protection/
Re:Pixel Security by wilg on Thursday November 17, 2016 @06:44PM (#12982931)
They also advertise it as "hassel"-free, which is funny.
Re:Pixel Security by Filligree on Thursday November 17, 2016 @09:15PM (#12983774)
Nut allergies can be serious business.
Re:Pixel Security by Klathmon on Thursday November 17, 2016 @06:54PM (#12983000)
Only if you buy that one phone from them on their website.

You could not get that phone second hand (or from any other reseller) and send it in to them for repair.

That's basically "insurance" included in the price of the phone, not a "pay for what you broke" repair center.

Re:Pixel Security by rincebrain on Friday November 18, 2016 @04:12AM (#12985421)
They've had that program for prior phones of theirs, that were not directly bought through them.

Source: I first heard about this program from my reseller-purchased HTC One m8.

Re:Pixel Security by indiv0 on Thursday November 17, 2016 @06:09PM (#12982654)
In the article, the author says that other companies (Samsung, Apple) do support that, but for a fee. It seems reasonable to expect Google to also provide that service.
Re:Pixel Security by Klathmon on Thursday November 17, 2016 @06:16PM (#12982713)
I guess Apple is one example I've used before, so I take back my previous statement there.

Still, I feel like that's a silly reason to advise people never buy the phone. Especially when they do provide an "insurance" policy with a "blessed 3rd party".