News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX FCC Application for over 4000 Internet Satellites by matt4077 on Thursday November 17, 2016 @02:18AM (#12975142)
I've seen two sorts of that kind of founder: some are just excellent and create 20 businesses each of which would be impressive on its own. And profitable.

The other: vast networks of companies all dependent on each other. When any one of them gets in trouble, it all comes falling down like a house of cards. And the chance of none of them getting into trouble? (1 - 0.<failure rate>)^<# of businesses>. That gets very small, very fast.

Lesson: never ever make a decision for business <b> because you also own business <a>. Too many people going from millionaire status to personal bancrupcy, at just about the moment where they're too old to start fresh, yet too young to coast.

Re:SpaceX FCC Application for over 4000 Internet Satellites by schiffern on Thursday November 17, 2016 @07:44AM (#12976925)
>Lesson: never ever make a decision for business <b> because you also own business <a>

Shouldn't the lesson be, "don't allow any singular company to become a single point of failure?"

Re:SpaceX FCC Application for over 4000 Internet Satellites by phkahler on Thursday November 17, 2016 @09:16AM (#12977592)
> Shouldn't the lesson be, "don't allow any singular company to become a single point of failure?"

Yes, but that requires more detailed analysis.

Re:SpaceX FCC Application for over 4000 Internet Satellites by sqeaky on Thursday November 17, 2016 @12:12PM (#12979260)
It is a better lesson though. Plenty of small to medium businesses fail when their main supplier or something goes under. For a small restaurant this could be as simple as making sure that you have two sources of that special berry (or whatever) you put in your signature dish.