Re:Twitter Suspends Prominent Alt-Right Accounts
by exclusiv on Thursday November 17, 2016 @03:44AM
(#12975600)
The ACLU disagrees with you. You can't have freedom of speech and then decide to put an asterisk on it. That's the paradox of tolerance.
We have laws on harassment and threats. You don't get to suppress people's speech even if they are idiots.
That's a real liberal position.
Believing that people that respect that idea are bullies is both unfounded and unfair.
Re:Twitter Suspends Prominent Alt-Right Accounts
by leereeves on Thursday November 17, 2016 @06:06AM
(#12976344)
> People who claim it's a negative are usually upset that they can't attack, belittle, or harass other people for their own amusement, I've found.
You say, as you attack and belittle people you disagree with...
(...not only people who behave that way, but everyone who thinks censorship is a negative.)
Re:Twitter Suspends Prominent Alt-Right Accounts
by kofejnik on Thursday November 17, 2016 @07:09AM
(#12976705)
>> Freedom can include the freedom from harasment
yeah, War is Peace
or, as they taught is in Scientific Communism classes, "Freedom is a conscientious necessity"
Re:Twitter Suspends Prominent Alt-Right Accounts
by Cakez0r on Thursday November 17, 2016 @09:34AM
(#12977725)
> Freedom can include the freedom from harasment
I would argue that it can't. Freedom is the freedom to do things. "Freedom from x" is just another way of saying "you're not allowed to do x".
People who claim it's a negative are usually upset that they can't attack, belittle, or harass other people for their own amusement, I've found.