News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On 2016 Apple: What do “Pro” users want? by rz2k on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @04:16PM (#12971615)
One type of port to rule them all, and fastest storage available are pretty good advances.

The ifixit teardown makes the machine look like a real mess inside, but I think drastically simplifying the connections to all external add-ons and the continued focus on the bottleneck of storage speed give reason to be optimistic about what the future holds.

Re:On 2016 Apple: What do “Pro” users want? by GVIrish on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @04:25PM (#12971706)
One type of port that requires most professionals to buy a bunch of dongles. That's not more useful, that's a hassle.

Macbooks have had available SSD's for awhile.

When it comes down to it, a bunch of sacrifices were made to make this Macbook thinner, which simply is of very little benefit to professional users. It's nice, but not when it comes at the expense of performance and usability.

Re:On 2016 Apple: What do “Pro” users want? by rz2k on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @04:32PM (#12971771)
It's double the speed of last year's SSD. Competitors' computers with the same speed hard drives will be upgraded more easily, but they aren't any cheaper right now.

While ridiculous that Apple doesn't ease the transition with more included cables, my house is full of different types of monitor cables, hard drive cables, and iOS device cables that seemed to change every two years. At least now I might get a decade out of the next generation of them.

Re:On 2016 Apple: What do “Pro” users want? by lstyls on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @05:35PM (#12972256)
> simplifying the connections to all external add-ons

The problem is that Apple did not simplify the connections. They unified them. The focus on a single hardware port is all well and good, but in this case it's just glossing over the fact that there are a wide array of different protocols that talk over this hardware and not all of the hardware supports them.

Re:On 2016 Apple: What do “Pro” users want? by legulere on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @05:36PM (#12972264)
SSD speeds do not differ between the touchbar and the non-touchbar edition, however the non-touchbar edition has a removable SSD.

With SSD speeds in macbooks being over one GB/s for years I also do not really see where storage throughput is a bottleneck.

Re:On 2016 Apple: What do “Pro” users want? by rebootthesystem on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @06:36PM (#12972678)
My apologies in advance. This video, although hard to watch, explains the issues in great detail.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XSC_UG5_kU