News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rust and the Future of Systems Programming [video] by pron on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @02:32PM (#12970571)
That's not true in general. I've used realtime Java in a safety critical hard realtime application (running on a large server), with strong deadline guarantees (we're talking microsecond range). If you have the power and RAM to spare, the predictability issue is more cheaply solved with the approach I mentioned above (by cheaply I mean in terms of development costs; it is more costly than "plain" GC in terms of effort, but still cheaper than the Rust approach).

The only real cost of GC these days is RAM (and power).

Re:Rust and the Future of Systems Programming [video] by nickpsecurity on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @04:46PM (#12971874)
Which VM did you use for that out of curiosity?
Re:Rust and the Future of Systems Programming [video] by pron on Thursday November 17, 2016 @01:24AM (#12974884)
Sun's Java Real-Time System. It is no longer supported, AFAIK, and I don't know which RT JVM the project has switched to because I'm no longer there (my guess would be IBM's).