News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Police raid Gizmodo editor's house by amohr on Monday April 26, 2010 @08:46PM (#1296762)
If this case is about stolen intellectual property, then Apple is most definitely involved. They have to specify the infringement on IP rights committed. If this were just a stolen phone, they wouldn't be confiscating every piece of technology he owns.
Re:Police raid Gizmodo editor's house by pyre on Monday April 26, 2010 @09:10PM (#1296810)
> If this were just a stolen phone, they wouldn't be confiscating every piece of technology he owns.

Nowadays that's standard operating procedure for any criminal investigation. There was an article on HN a while back about the police in SF confiscating the laptops of DJs at illegal raves and tying them up in paperwork to get their gear back just to punish them for helping out the raves (the DJs' laptops are their main source of income in a lot of cases).

Police love computers because people do a lot of their interaction with the world through them now. So by confiscating someone's computer they can get a lot of information.

Re:Police raid Gizmodo editor's house by ErrantX on Monday April 26, 2010 @08:59PM (#1296795)
> If this were just a stolen phone, they wouldn't be confiscating every piece of technology he owns.

What about photographs, emails and records relating to the person it was bought from?