News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Police raid Gizmodo editor's house by jrockway on Monday April 26, 2010 @07:51PM (#1296651)
If someone found my lost phone in a bar, I doubt any search warrants would be served.

Apple has something to do with this case.

Re:Police raid Gizmodo editor's house by mbreese on Monday April 26, 2010 @09:22PM (#1296827)
Your phone, obviously, isn't that important.

When the phone in question is a prototype of a model that is destined to sell millions, it gets noticed. But, it's important to look at this as a criminal investigation. There're is the suspiction that a criminal act occurred. A judge agreed, and issued a search warrant. Just based upon Gizmodo's coverage alone, there is enough to suspect that a crime happened. Because this is Apple property, it gets greater scrutiny, but it's not like Apple signed the warrant.

You can expect a whole other level of hurt for Gizmodo from Apple in a civil suit.

And I thought Google blocking cnet for a year was bad... Just imagine what the Apple blackout will be like for Gizmodo.

Re:Police raid Gizmodo editor's house by ptomato on Monday April 26, 2010 @08:37PM (#1296748)
If you were, say, a major celebrity and there was a lot of press about it (as in this case) there would be.