Re:A One-Line Proof of the Infinitude of Primes
by JadeNB on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @03:18PM
(#12961791)
> And actually any periodic function that is zero somewhere could be used in a tiny bit modified version of this proof.
I think that, for the modification to be tiny, you need something like: there is an interval on which the function is positive, and on the boundary of which it vanishes. (Some sign condition is necessary; taking the constant function at 0 doesn't work! Of course, this particular condition is automatically satisfied for any continuous, periodic function that vanishes somewhere, but is not identically 0.)
And actually any periodic function that is zero somewhere could be used in a tiny bit modified version of this proof.