News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Backblaze hard drive reliability stats for Q3 2016 by atom_enger on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @01:01PM (#12960423)
I'd suggest switching to a static site in general. I have no idea what kind of traffic they're sustaining at the moment but NGINX serving up static html (or s3) is a lot more efficient than Wordpress or another blog engine consuming cpu cycles.
Re:Backblaze hard drive reliability stats for Q3 2016 by theandrewbailey on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @01:10PM (#12960526)
At the very least, use a reverse proxy with lots of caching.