News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Progress on addressing online abuse by ohyoutravel on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:23AM (#12958722)
A crowdsourced "blocked list" similar to ublock origin for twitter?
Re:Progress on addressing online abuse by TorKlingberg on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:41AM (#12958877)
This already exists. Of course, you get plenty of disagreement about who should be on the list.
Re:Progress on addressing online abuse by huac on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:42AM (#12958885)
these exist, but because 'annoying account' is a subjective decision, while 'advertisement url' is an objective decision, it is difficult to create a list with a clear brightline between harassment and disagreement
Re:Progress on addressing online abuse by nailer on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:48AM (#12958956)
There is at least one hard-left feminist who ended up on GGAutoblock because Randi Harper just disliked her.
Re:Progress on addressing online abuse by jansenv on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:46AM (#12958937)
This sounds like the kind of thing that will get abused if widely adopted.
Re:Progress on addressing online abuse by digler999 on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:32AM (#12958789)
then you could harass people by falsely getting them on a block list.
Re:Progress on addressing online abuse by strictnein on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:42AM (#12958886)
I'm already on some block lists. I'll run into some journalists who have me blocked. Never interacted with them. I hardly interact with anyone, but some block lists just take the entire list of followers from people and add them.