Uikit – A lightweight and modular front-end framework

Re:Uikit – A lightweight and modular front-end framework by chj on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @01:18AM (#12956030)

What if he doesn't know about Object C at all? Different domain, I think.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uikit – A lightweight and modular front-end framework by justinator on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @02:10AM (#12956208)

I dunno. A different domain would be like if I called my new bluegrass band, Uikit.

This name does sort of confuse. Although I don't know how more generic you can get then, "User Interface Kit", although the capitalization of Uikit is a little awkward.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uikit – A lightweight and modular front-end framework by elsurudo on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:03AM (#12958539)

Not that generic – Apple uses "kit" as a suffix for most of their frameworks, and I don't know any other large frameworks that do that (could be wrong on this, of course, but it does seem an "Apple thing" at this point).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uikit – A lightweight and modular front-end framework by kellyjprice on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @06:10PM (#12963175)

I can think of 2 much older examples of 'kit', as a part of toolkit, in a UI framework name:

* GTK

* Tk of Perl/Tk

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uikit – A lightweight and modular front-end framework by huxley on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @07:54PM (#12963719)

NeXTSTEP (macOS and iOS's predecessor) predates Tk's the use of the term kit by 3 years and GTK's by almost 10.

[ Parent | on HN ]